Friday, 27 September 2013

Do we need another Josiah?


Brief historical background
After the division of Israel kingdom into northern and southern kingdom (Israel and Judah), the Israelites went astray from God beginning from the reign of Rehoboam to Ahaz (922-715 B.C) more than 200 years. But when Hezekiah came to rule over Judah he did what was right in the eyes of the Lord, just as his father David had done (2 Kings 18:3).
After the death of Hezekiah his son Manasseh came to power but he did evil in the eyes of the Lord, following the detestable practices of the nations the Lord had driven out before the Israelites. He erected altars to Baal and made an Asherah pole. His evil work provoked God to anger (2 Kings21:1-18). He reigned for fifty-five years. After his death, his son Amon reigned for two years but he too did evil (2 Kings 21:19-25). Josiah became king when he was just eight years old but reformation took place only after the 18th year of his reign, which means till that time Israelites were worshipping idols. Manasseh reign 55 yrs + Amon 2yrs + Josiah found the book of Law in the 18th yrs of his reign (55+2+18=75 yrs). After the death of Hezekiah another 75 years Israelites went astray.  
Josiah method of reformation
During the eighteenth years of Josiah’s reign the book of law was found in the temple of the Lord by Hilkiah the high priest, he gave it to Shaphan the secretary and Shaphan read from it in the presence of the king. When the king heard it he torn his robes and seek for God’s favor (2 Kings 22:3-11). The king’s responsive to the word of God does not end the story but he brought reformation and renews the covenant with God. Let us look at some of the methods of Josiah in the process of reformation from 2Kings 23.

1.       At the outset the King did not take decision himself but consulted the elders and mass participation was held in the temple of the Lord (vv.1-3). The king humbled himself, seeking to do the will of God. Then all the people pledged themselves to the covenant. How the king moved the people? He did not simply order or made decision from his luxurious Palace. He left his palace and went up to the temple. He is a man of both word and action. When the leaders humbled themselves and seek to do the will of God their people will surely follow them.
2.      The king smashed down Baal, Asherah, and Ashtoreth (v.4 & 13): These gods are known to be the fertility gods of Canaanites. What does these gods mean to us? People are too materialistic; the contemporary idols are wealth, fame, pride, position, selfish, nepotism etc. Whether we like it or not these things are prevailing in our society. Who will destroy them?
3.      The king desecrated Topheth (v.10): Topheth is ascribed to human sacrifice. No doubt that we don’t practice human sacrifice yet, killings, extortions, prevails. There are assassinations of the basic rights of others by way of unfair means, and many isms. Do not respect the moral values of others, discriminate down trodden, unequal distributions of share, and many more which equalizes the human sacrifices.
4.      The king did away with the pagan priests appointed by the kings (v.5): Those days the pagan priests were appointed by the kings so that they can perform burnt offering in favor of the kings not God. Today many church leaders’ falls prey in the hands of rich and influential people. Priorities are given to them and there is no justice in the church. Giving much importance to those in the power. Follow their decree rather than what the Bible or God says.
5.      The king tore down the quarters of the shrine-prostitutes (v.7): Sexual immorality is one of the common practiced to this day. It is totally against the will of God and highly condemnable. We talk so much of abstinence, but do our society today free from sexual immorality. In contrary most leaders are the victims of sexual immorality.
6.      The king burnt all the idols and shrines from the Kidron valley and brought the ashes to Bethel (v.4). ‘Bethel’ in Hebrew is “House of the Lord”, which means all the cleansing is done in the House of the Lord only. The Church should be the place to cleanse all sorts of social evils.
7.      The king ordered the people to celebrate Passover (v.21-23) which was stopped ever since from judges to the kings. Israelites were observing Passover for the deliverance when the angel of death passed over Israelite homes in Egypt. This is the annual festival to commemorate the deliverance from Egypt. Today are we free from all kinds of evil? Can anyone boldly say we are corruption free society? Is there any reason for us to celebrate? They have a reason to celebrate because they did what is right in the eyes of God. We celebrate so many festivals but ironically during festivals we do all kinds of evil. King Josiah ordered his people to rejoice because they have cleansed all the evil things in the society. They removed the idols and pledged to do the will of God.

Josiah took so seriously its injunctions and threats that he initiated the most sweeping reforms in the Hebrew history – indeed, a veritable revolution – which lasted until his death. Josiah’s reforms often interpreted solely in religious terms. They were more than the re-establishment of the supremacy of Yaweh worship and the uprooting of idolatrous practices in Jerusalem and all over Judah. Josiah did not only demolish the Assyrian altars but also dared to carry his crusade into northern Israel (vv.15 &19).

Josiah like leadership is needed in our society today. Many leaders can speak better but cannot do well. Beginning from individual to family and to society at large we find corruption everywhere. People are crying for justice, and peace. Some are struggling for square meal a day. There is a huge gap between haves and haves not. Who is going to fill the gap? Where are our leaders? Can anyone come to rescue? How long are we going to suffer?

Should we expect another Josiah to bring reformation in our society? After a gap of 75 years Josiah reformed the society, reaffirm the covenant with God. Dear friends how long have we been away from God? We proclaim Nagaland for Christ but how far is it true in reality? We really need reformation. Let us reaffirm our commitment. Let us not wait for another Josiah but let us be the agent of change. Josiah is you and me. 

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Effective Gospel Communication

1.      Introduction
            For the effective presentation of gospel it is imperative for a gospel messenger to have communication skills and skills of adaptability since the major task of the Christian mission is communicating the gospel of Jesus Christ to the unreached. Communication as we know is ‘not only verbal, but holistic, that is, by life, words and deed’.[1] or which we need to learn the cultural context by understanding their social life, economic stability, religion or beliefs. It is in this learning that we come to identify with the people and their ways and gradually built trust. Lacking of proper communication may hamper to penetrate the gospel to a certain areas if the gospel is not well fitted within the context of that culture. Therefore we must understand what culture is all about and see how the gospel can be meaningfully interpreted and communicated within that cultural frame.
2.      What is Communication?
The word communication derived from the Latin word ‘communis’ and it includes the concept of relationships.[2]Communication is a process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or exchange of information. Communication is not something accidental and supplementary for human beings but it exists along with the creation as we see from the creation account in the Bible where everything has been formed through the word of God. Communication is a complex subject where definition is difficult. This is further complicated by the different backgrounds and persuasions evident among writers on the subject. So, in spite of the fact that the communication process is utterly fundamental to all our psychological and social processes, our understanding of the communication process is limited.[3]However we can assume that communication is a process from the perspective of the communicator and receptor that moves through a life process. Paul G. Hiebert points out that “Two-way communication is particularly important in missions”.[4] Communication is fundamental to man because human being is the only creature on earth who can put communication in the form of symbols which have no relationship to their referents aside from that which he assigns to them. Moreover, transcending time and space, he can transfer information to others in remote places or to those who will yet be born.[5]
3.      Tools of Communication
 Missionary evangelist may import new media and introduce innovations in media use, but it will be wise to give attention to indigenous media first. These may range from simple chalkboards to television sets. Local availability and usage should be carefully studied. Then the process of media selection can begin.[6]
Different kinds of tools can be used in communicating the gospel, however the potential media for gospel communication can be classified into three main divisions:
a.      Printed media such as News papers, Magazines, Journals, Books, Pamphlets and tracts, Mailing, Billboards etc.
b.      Electronic media such as Radio, Television, Movies, Slides, Records, Cassette tape  
etc.
c. Other media includes Drama, puppets, street plays, theatre show, concerts etc.
 Once we have identified and characterized our target audience, it is natural to ask how we will communicate the message to them contextually. The key to successful gospel communication is to utilize as much varieties possible, with special attention to biblical principles, the gift of the missionary-evangelist, and the preferences of the audience. Much Christian communication is, and should be, spontaneous. But there is much communication that should be carefully planned.[7]
4.      Different types of Communication
a.      Intrapersonal Communication
Intrapersonal is a reflection of inner augmentation and other intellectual exercises of a person that send and receives any messages that do not get outside of our bodies. Intrapersonal communication is of course, the primary and foundation step towards subsequent interpersonal and group communication. Intrapersonal communication has three basic functions – evaluation, resolution, and adjustment.

b.      Interpersonal Communication
Communication between two people is called interpersonal communication. It is difficult to understand each other however through interpersonal communication adequate understanding is possible and communication can be satisfactory as long as both persons recognize that a margin of misunderstanding may exist. For the effective communication it is suggest to listen more, rather than speak more.
c.       Group Communication
Human relationship does not develop as we simply assume, but we should realize how much human relation does associate with problems when it moves from intrapersonal and interpersonal to group communication. The multitude of problems accompanying increase in group should be consider seriously by local churches that are intent upon building huge and unwieldy memberships.[8]
5.      Levels of Communication
a.      Verbal communication
Verbal communication skills may be developed in many directions, and in this the communicator can develop the art of delivery such as spoken language. Although language may not be the most prominent characteristic of a person, it is one of the most revealing. Until verbal communication is established - knowledge of other people is limited and one sided. Language open up their other side, their thoughts, their interests, their views of life is effect themselves. Speaking language consists of audible symbols expressed by the speaker and these symbols vary according to our understanding and familiarity with the specific language.[9]
b.      Nonverbal Communication 
We assume that communication as being only verbal, whether in written or spoken symbols however communication also occurs in nonverbal, inaudible context which is also called silent language. Certain body movements correspond with audible speech messages. In some cases, the associated body movement may replace speech altogether.[10] Nonverbal communications also includes distributions of pamphlets and tracks, audio visual aids, our way of living, body movement etc. which has lot of impact. Non-Christians usually respond more readily to Christian action than to Christian verbalism. Nonverbal extends beyond a man’s character to include his attitude and even his appearance. Therefore Christian ought to be aware of the nature and function of metacommunication.[11]
6.      Aspects of Cross-Culture Communication
Context is the most important cultural dimension and also immensely difficult to define. The idea of context in culture was an idea put forth by an anthropologist by the name of Edward T Hall. Hall breaks up culture into two main groups: High and Low context cultures. He refers to context as the stimuli, environment or ambiance surrounding the environment. Depending on how a culture relies on the points to communicate their meaning, will place them in either High or Low context cultures. For example, Hall goes on to explain that low-context cultures assume that the individuals know very little about what they are being told, and therefore must be given a lot of background information. High-Context cultures assume the individual is knowledgeable about the subject and has to be given very little background information.[12]
7.      Barriers in communicating the gospel
a.       Christian Mission refers to propagation of the gospel, expansion of the reign of God, conversion of the non Christians and founding of new church. Many of the missionary organizations and churches are involved in carrying out the mission of the church rather than gospel,[13] thereby the gospel cannot be fitted properly within the cultural context.
b.      We are convinced that the gospel of Jesus Christ saves, liberates, and in the life to come, but the major problem faced by the missionaries is that the hearers are not always convinced. To communicate the people of different culture is fraught with difficulties.[14]
c.       The failure to differentiate between the gospel and human cultures has been one of the greatest weaknesses of modern Christian missions. Missionaries too often have equated the Good News with their own cultural background. This has led them to condemn most native customs and impose their own converts. Consequently the gospel has been seen as foreign in general and western in particular.
d.      Superior complexity, dim view of the pagan religions, exporting denominationalism along with the Gospel etc., create the barriers in communicating the gospels. People reject gospel not because they reject the Lordship of Christ but because conversion often has meant a denial of their cultural heritage and social ties.[15]
e.       The barriers in communicating the Gospel includes Religious barrier, Ethnic Barrier, Linguistic barrier, Regional barrier, Economic Barrier, etc.
8.      Communicating gospel with effective method
God achieved his communication goals through love. He is true lover and he demonstrated that to be true lover is to have as our primary concern for the receptors without considering the cost to ourselves since God’s love itself is receptor-oriented communication. Such an approach demands a high respect for the receptors, a trust in them as persons created in the image of God, and even making ourselves vulnerable in communication. It also means entering totally into the context of the audience, using their language and frame of reference. Many Christians believe that preaching is God’s ordained means of communicating the gospel to others. Furthermore, we often believe that the sermon is an effective method of bringing about change in the people’s lives, but sadly it was not so. This does not meant to undermined the importance of preaching sermon because preaching also useful for a certain purposes however so long as communication is concern we need to consider question such as: Have we devoted enough time to reflection on what the gospel is for the context we are communicating to? Have we devoted all our efforts on refining the packaging without examining the products? Should Christian programs and literature not concentrate more on sharing what Christians do in the local contexts in obedience to Christ rather than producing abstract universal message about what we believe? Should communication ministries be more integrally related with the witness of the church in a given context?[16]
9.      Paul method of communicating the gospel
The entire second half of the book of Acts is dedicated to Paul’s catalytic role in the advance of the gospel throughout the Roman Empire. Luke portrays Paul of Tarsus as a missionary of extra ordinary flexibility and cultural sensitivity. On the one hand he regularly associates with gentiles, shares meal with them, even stays in Gentiles homes, all without difference to boundary-making Jewish food laws, (Acts 11:26;16:15,34,40;17:4-7) on the other hand, for the sake of his missionary work among Jews, Paul has his coworker Timothy circumcised (Acts 16:3) and later he consents to undergo the Jewish rite of purification in the temple at Jerusalem (Acts 21:23-24,26) for our immediate purpose, however it is Paul’s missionary preaching that is most significant.[17]
            Paul’s evangelistic encounter at Pisdian Antioach shows about the process of contextualizing the gospel in Acts through apostolic gospel, the word of salvation (Acts 13:26) which centers on the death and resurrection of Christ as the fulfillment of God’s redemptive plan for humanity. Paul’s missionary sermon in Acts 13 is a masterpiece of contextualization for a synagogue gathering. When preaching to Jews, Paul incorporates his audiences’ history, its expectations, its scriptures and its culturally accepted methods of interpretation in order to persuasively proclaim the good news. Even the climatic announcement of Jesus’ resurrection is put forward as the realization of the Davidic promise to Israel. There is continuity in the narrative thread that moves from God’s saving activity in the story of John and Jesus and Gentiles all of which are related to scripture and to God’s promise.
            Paul’s gospel message is not simply contextually appropriate, it also challenges its Jewish hearers’ entire way of seeing the world. It seeks to reshape their understanding of their national history and their scriptures in light of the new story of the resurrected Jesus of Nazareth. The gospel confronts its Jewish audience with a new Christian vision and the need for profound change.[18]
10.  Culture response to Gospel
The question of the relationship of the gospel to culture is cultural to evangelism and missions. The Gospel is the message of God to be communicated to human beings in human language. Evangelism is basically God’s work, yet it is man’s response to God’s saving grace. The gospel is communicated to people and through people. Therefore people are important and cultural factors have to be taken seriously because they cannot be separated from their culture.[19]
Every human being is to a large extent a product of cultural values. God created human being as learning being and let live within the culture of its own set up. No one can deny the fact that he/she is attached to the culture and as such none can escape the way culture impacts communication. Culture keep changing according to the time and places, it is dynamic and not static. Human beings are part of the cultural fabric that affects every person. For which the gospel is needed to interpret culturally appropriate so that people response to it.
11.    Outcome of communication of the gospel
The strong recommended work for communicating gospel cross-culturally is to set up indigenous principles and encouraging local believers to be able to form and manage self-propagation, self-supporting, self governing and self theologizing.[20] When William Carey came to India his goal is to set up an indigenous church by means of native preacher and by providing the scripture in the native tongue.[21]  Three questions are paramount in evaluating how well the gospel is being communicated: (1) Is the message actually getting through to the intended audience? (2) Is the message we intend the message that is actually being received? (3) Are the methods and media serving their intended ends, and not becoming ends in themselves? The means of answering these questions range from personal conversation and observation to thorough community surveys employing advanced statistical methods. The means should fit the size and nature of the recipients. Increasingly, the messengers of Christ are becoming concerned with the quality of Christian communication. But quality means far more than employing the best talent and the most up-to-date technology. It also has reference to the content of the message, the method of its presentation, and the kind of media chosen to convey it.[22]
12.  Conclusion
            As a member of the body of Christ, God has given us specific task to spread His word to every nation and save His every creation, however the question is how are we going to deal? Every society has its culture and is unique in its form and different from one another.
We really need to understand the cultural context, it is essential so that society can be transformed. If the cross cultural missionary fails to respect the other culture where is the place for the Gospel? Interpretation of the Bible within the context will have a great impact in communicating the Gospel. Culture itself is Divine design. Cultural awareness expands our narrow perspective and makes us capable of effectively communicating the Gospel. Much have been discussed above, for which I would like to summarize that, as cross-cultural missionary we should be sensitive enough to different cultures and in order to penetrate the gospel to the new cultural context we need to well equipped with skills of communication. Communication as we know is the only way to understand others. Using of same mode of communication does not fit to all the culture equally. Therefore one should know how to use the different tools, ways and means of communication according to the mindset of the people and their world view. Ways of expressing ideas, ways of acting, ways of interacting, ways if channeling the message, ways of deciding will have a great positive impact in communicating the gospel effectively.





























[1]  F. Hrangkhuma, Tribes in Transition: Indian Christians Reflect on the Original Inhabitants of the Land (Bangalore: SAIACS, 2004), 11.
[2] Viggo Sogaard, Media in Church and Mission (Bangalore: Theological Book Trust, 1998), 51.
[3] Ibid, 29.
[4] Paul G. Hiebert, Anthropological Insights for Missionaries (Grand Rapid: Bakers Book House Company, 1985), 165.
[5] David J. Hesselgrave, Communicating Christ Cross-Culturally, 2nd ed. ( Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1978 ), 22.
[6] David J. Hesselgrave, Planting Churches Cross-culturally, (Michigan: Bakers Books, 2000), 166.
[7] Ibid,. 165.
[8] Raynold W. McLaughlin, Communication for the Church, (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1968 ), 62-67.
[9] Sherwood G. Lingenfelter and Marvin K. Mayers, Ministering Cross-Culturally (Michigan: Bakers Book House, 1986), 27.

[10] A. Scott Morew, Gary R. Corwin et.al, Introducing World Mission, A Biblical, Historical and Practical Survey (Grand Rapid: Bakers Academy, 2004), 88.
[11] Raynold W. McLaughlin, Communication for the Church, (Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1968 ), 68.
[13] John Joshua Raja and Samson Prabhakar, Introduction to Communication and Media Studies (BTESSC/SATHRI, 2006), 191.
[14] Hrangkhuma, Tribes in Transition, 11.
[15] Hiebert, Anthropological Insights for Missionaries, 54.
[16] Viggo Sogaard, Media in Church and Mission, 16-17.
[17] Dean Flamming, Contextualization in the New Testament, pattern for Theology and Mission (Intervarsity Press, 2005), 56.
[18] Flamming, Contextualization in the New Testament, pattern for Theology and Mission, 65-66.

[19] S.D Ponraj, An Introduction to Missionary Anthropology, (Mission Educational book series No.5, 1993), 59.
[20] Dennis Teague, Culture: The Missing Link in Mission (Manila, Philippines: OMF Literature Inc.,1996), 482.
[21] Ibid., 491.
[22] David J. Hesselgrave, Planting Churches Cross-culturally, 166.

Sunday, 22 September 2013

Servant?

Servant Leadership
General understanding of leadership is the one who exercise authority, the sole and the ultimate decision maker, either right or wrong, boss is always right. This attitude exists not only in the secular world but has crept in to the Christian leadership as well. For Christian leaders we need to understand the model of our Lord Jesus Christ how he served as leader. At this juncture, I personally felt that we need to redefine what Christian leadership is all about. Nelson Mandela says “Anyone who can influence people can be called a leader”. A good leader is one who has made a lasting impact on people who is not commanding.  The primary definition of a leadership is based on one’s ability to influence. There are more areas on which a leader can be defining though.
Servant Leadership Model
Servanthood can be viewed as Jesus’ model which every Christian leader must bear in mind that whoever wants to become a great leader must first become a humble servant. For even the son of God did not come to be served but to serve and to give His life as a ransom for many. Similarly Peter also exhorts his fellow leaders. ‘Be shepherds of God’s flock….. not lording it over those entrusted to you but being example to the flock’ ( 1 Peter 5:2-3).[1] It is clear that identification leads to openness, friendship, and trust. It is to be fact that servanthood leaders are those ready to close to everyone.
Therefore the servant leaders must be always ready to set an example to others not only through exhortation or encouragement. The church leaders should be the one intended to be a captain of the game not just as coach, shouts and preaches.
Let us briefly look at some model:
1.      Humility
Jesus teaches that servant leaders lead humbly. They are characterized as humble or selfless leaders. Matthew 20:25-26 says: “Jesus called them together and said, ‘You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you.”? ‘In humility consider others better than yourselves. Each one of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interest of others” (Phil 2: 6-7). [2]Critical element of your leadership is how you serve. It’s all about humility, not ego. Leaders must not misuse their authority and abuse their subordinates; instead, we are to serve with humility.
2.      Service
Jesus taught that the essence of servant leadership is service, not status. Combined with the first characteristic of servant leadership, we find that servant leadership is about humble service. This is the kind of service that involves giving of oneself, not taking for oneself.
3.      Focus on Others
Servant leadership is selfless. In Matthew 20:20-28, it talks about our service which focuses on others. Jesus came to serve and give his life for many, and so also must our service be to benefit others, not ourselves. Jesus does not call the disciples to be servants in a general sense. He exhorts them specifically to be servants of one another.
The Christian leader must focus their service on others; a leader must not be self seeking. However, leader should be for the community as he serves them.
4.      Love
The fourth element that is integral to servant leadership is love. The love of leader for their followers is the reason servant leaders serve; it’s their motivation. Probably Jesus washed his disciples’ feet one or two days after Jesus’ instruction in Matthew 20:20:24-28. John makes it very clear that Jesus’ motive was love, “having loved his own who were in the world, he now showed them the full extent of his love.” [3]Likewise, leaders must show their love to their followers by fulfilling all their needs and by serving them with humble attitude. As we know love is patient, kind, humble, respectful, selfless, forgiving, honest, and committed.[4]
Strategies of Servant Leadership
There are at least three practical applications for the empowering model for servant leadership or growing people as, mentoring, coaching and team building.
1.      Mentoring
Technically mentoring is the more formal term denoting and intentional, intensive, voluntary relationship between the leader and the follower mentoring is a relational experience in which one person empowers another by sharing him or herself. Coaches and players from the context point of mentoring is also all about an interactive learning relationship mutually between leaders and the followers.[5]
As above in the few line discussion, mentoring is assumed to be a powerful form of leadership in every field particularly it is helpful to teaching and learning. By means of such challenges in the church leaders today how can you identify about the mentoring relationships when we consider over our past life we came across? Are you sure to face situation when you are in trouble? Wake up and set some of the strategies for the solid mentorship for the growth of development as a humble servant of God.
2.      Coaching
It is less structured than mentoring. It is also a participative approach to leadership rather than a directive approach. A leader himself or herself should set an example.
Give personal guidance and direction when someone is learning new, Keep result orientation, Keep the focused on the goals ahead, Try not to say ‘I told you so’, Give at least second chance to try, Maintain an open door policy, Give him/her full attention during discussion hour, so that it won’t be distracted, Make hard work worth it, Preserve the individuality of his/her team member Spend sometimes with them.[6]
A Christian leader must hear a mind that leaders are for the people as, Lincoln says that, ‘Government is for the people’ of the people and by the people; As prior to our discussion, coaching is a participating approach to leadership. The work done is for the good of the mission as well serving the community but not as the people for the people.
3.      Team Building
Team building is closely linked with these two following strategies above. Good coaches produce a good team. The effective leaders needs to be able to build and motivates team of people who take ownership of their unit’s results and participate in the decision that affects their work experience. In a context today leadership become literature and management is more focus on team approaches to leadership, coaching, participating, work groups and that task focuses. To build a team is necessary to keep trust which is component of team unity. The team must also trust the leader and they must know that the leader also trust them.[7]
Conclusion
Leadership is not just about position. Leadership in a truer Christian sense is all about service to others need. Our Christian leaders today need to see how Jesus set an example as leader. He became a servant washing his disciples’ feet. Jesus used his authority in a unique ways. His authority consists in his humility service obedience to the Father’s will. He also showed the exemplary model through his life.
“And whoever wishes to be first among you shall be slave of all. For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many" (Mark 10:44-45).






[1] C.Gene Wilkies, Jesus on  Leadership, (Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, 1996), 45.
[2] Ibid, 38.
[3] Aubrey Malphurs, Being Leaders, 41.
[4] James C. Hunter, The World Most Powerful Leadership Principle; How to Become a Servant Leader, (New York: Crown Business, 2004), 99.
[5] Andy Stanley, Next Generation Leader, 108.
[6] John C. Maxwell, Developing the Leaders Around You, 156, 157.
[7] Jesudason Basker Jeyarej. Christian Ministry Models of Ministry and Training (Bangalore: Theological Book Trust, 2002), 251.